Saturday, June 11, 2011

John L. Lewis (February 12, 1880 – June 11, 1969)


John L. Lewis 
(February 12, 1880 – June 11, 1969)






“I shall order the men to disregard your order, to stand fast. I shall then walk up to the largest window in the plant, open it, divest myself of my outer raiment, remove my shirt, and bare my bosom. Then when you order your troops to fire, mine will be the first heart that these bullets will strike!”

-  John L. Lewis’ response to the governor of Michigan, when he threatened to send troops against striking autoworkers during the 1937 Flint sit down strike















The History of the United Mine Workers Union

 

 by MIKE ALEWITZ

 7’ x 100’ Portable Mural/ 1990 

 

 

The 100’ History of the United Mine Workers Union was commissioned for the one hundredth convention of the union.  (It hung for a day and was then suppressed by the top officials). The mural begins with children working in the mines and ends with them on the Pittston picket line. 

 

The following is excerpted from Insurgent Images by Paul Buhle: 

 

Going back to the latter decades of the nineteenth century, American coal miners had an extremely militant tradition from Pennsylvania and Appalachia to Indiana, Illinois, and Kansas. The causes are not difficult to locate. Not only was coal mining the most dangerous occupation worldwide (it continues to be so today), measured by the number of deaths and injuries, but internally, that is, among workers themselves, it is one of the most democratic. By a centuries' old tradition of Welsh and English miners, young workers still learning the trade and old workers in their last years shared the least skilled jobs; to begin was to see the end in sight, at least for those fortunate enough to escape death or maiming in "the pits." Perhaps for these reasons, coal mining was also among the few racially integrated and unionized occupations of a century ago, although African Americans enjoyed fewer benefits and a constant threat of complete marginalization within the deeply racist American Federation of Labor.

 

But the UMW tended also, from its first decades, to be boss-ridden. The small coal-patch towns were an ideal political base for union grafting and for lucrative political trading with Democrats (and, on many occasions, Republicans). Taking office shortly after the beginning of the new century, John Mitchell, the first UMW president of wide reputation, quickly became known for his high living, his socializing with big businessmen, and his autocratic behavior in office. John L. Lewis, arguably the greatest American labor orator after Eugene V. Debs, came to power in the same tradition of double-dealing and frequent betrayal.

 

Lewis's career was marked by the acquisition of a personal fortune, but also by apparently wild swings against the Left, during which time he stuffed ballots and employed thugs to beat back radical threats to his power, alternating with swings toward the issues of the Left, as when he invited Communists into the new Congress of Industrial Organizations that he did much to bring into being. Lewis could also be more militant than the largest section of the Left, as during wartime when he called out miners in 1941, over Franklin Roosevelt's threats of injunction and over Communist demands that labor cease strikes for the duration. His threat to form a Labor Party in 1940 (he eventually supported Republican Wendell Wilkie) was the closest approach to national, independent labor politics for generations; his shifts, from the AFL to the CIO and back to the AFL, marked his frustrations with labor leaders' unwillingness to live up to the potential of the movement.

 

Lewis grasped as few American union bosses that his strength depended upon membership mobilization more than upon political trading-which as a registered Republican he did frequently, for his own purposes. From the early 1920s through the late 1940s, leading regional walkouts, he used his extraordinary vocal powers and capacity for organization to keep the union members and their families in struggle. He fearlessly denounced all opposition alike (employers. police, and the state) as the enemies of the miners and of the working class. In his later decades before retirement in 1957, while mines shut and automation cut further into the workforce, he traded struggle for retirement and health benefits. His immediate successor, the thuggish Tony Boyle, had all Lewis's defects and none of his virtues; democratic challenger Jock Yablonsky was counted out at a union election in 1969, and then murdered along with his family, apparently by Boyle henchmen. 

 

Arnold Miller, the reform candidate who came to power in 1972, brought the union real democracy but faced overwhelming odds. As the oil crisis of the 1970s brought back coal production, Miller faced a petition campaign to recall him from office. Disappointed with their president, miners nevertheless recognized the coal companies' deepest intentions: to weaken historic union control over work, and to strip away the health and safety benefits that kept coal towns alive. The strike that began in December 1977 awakened solidarity in a dormant labor movement. Even as leading 1 AFL-CIO officials dithered, more concerned with increasing the defense budget and pleasing a Democratic administration than with unions' steady decline, thousands of union members responded.

 

Heartened, UMW ranks turned down, at the bitter height of winter, a poor offer that Miller recommended for ratification. Even when the "pro-labor" Jimmy Carter ordered miners back under the Taft-Hartley Act that he'd promised to help repeal '' and as welfare officials refused food stamps to strikers, the miners held steady. After more than a hundred days on the picket line, they had won labor's most significant victory in an era of defeats. Oscar-winning Harlan County-USA (1976), a film made by documentarist Barbara Kopple, recorded the faces and voices of Kentucky miners and their families for millions of labor's sympathizers.

 

This was the background for events of the later 1980s. Pittston Coal, subsidiary of a giant conglomerate and a major coal exporter to Japan, withdrew in 1986 from the industry-wide labor agreement, attacking insurance, pensions, widows' benefits and the historic prerogative of miners to refuse the compulsory overtime work particularly hazardous in the trade. It was also a test for new miners' president Richard Trumka, elected in 1982 after a ferocious redbaiting campaign, to hold strong against what would have been a crippling defeat to the union. Hold they did. As the miners "worked to rule" (the old Wobbly tactic of staying at work and obeying regulations to the letter, hence slowing production) and organized a "corporate campaign" against Pittston management, the conflict escalated and in spring 1989 led to an explosive strike. Miners organized their families, neighbors, and communities, dressed in camouflage clothes like guerilla warriors, peacefully blocked scab trucks with their bodies and appealed for a wider solidarity.

 

The summer of 1989 saw the emergence of "Camp Solidarity" and the formal reaffiliation of the UMW with the AFL-CIO. Thousands of unionists from across the country came to stay for days or weeks, living out of tents and trailers, taking part in picketing, rallies and informal discussions. At one point miners occupied a coal processing center, the first time this sit-in tactic had been successfully adopted in generations. It was, in all, a historic moment that only the paucity of national press coverage and the phlegmatic character of labor leadership prevented from becoming a national cause celebre.

 

Mike Alewitz had special reasons for enthusiasm and involvement in this struggle. Not only the UMW traditions of militancy and commitment to winning the current strike, but the example of the P-9 strike all suggested that Pittston could become a kind of turning point for a broader shift within labor. He also helped to make a genuine cultural contribution, although his experience attempting to bring fellow artists to Austin had proved disappointing. Traveling to Nicaragua for the sake of workers and peasants obviously possessed more appeal than a trip to the midwest and its blue-collar (or rural) population, but Pittston might spark a collective artistic enthusiasm and insight. Besides, Alewitz's expulsion from the Socialist Workers Party intensified his determination to sink roots into New Jersey union activities. By dint of energy and good humor, he made himself the dean of the state's labor artists, the natural leader of an extended solidarity campaign with the prospect of raising strategic issues for the labor movement. His political comrade of a decade (and an early collaborator on murals), Bob Allen, had been a miner for some years before settling in New Brunswick, and Allen maintained friends and contacts among the UMW. Alewitz, Allen, and Gauvreau traveled to Pittston in summer 1989, bringing with them most of the art supplies (paid for by Alewitz's sign painters' local) necessary for a camp banner. 

 

Camp Solidarity quickly reminded the visitors that the mineworkers' union had in many unique ways retained its rich cultural traditions. Local union musicians exchanged songs with visitors around the country (and the world: Britain's Billy Bragg came to share music). Videos about the strike were quickly produced and widely shown in union locals elsewhere; camp dorms and trailers sprouted all sorts of popular art; and clog dancing broke out with amazing frequency. The mountain culture of the region could meld, as it had done so often in the past, with the contemporary struggles of the miners, releasing a collective creativity of remarkable proportions.

 

Behind the local color stood a rock-hard determination. The "Daughters of Mother Jones," a group of women miners, also spouses, mothers, and daughters, carried on a demonstrative support of the strike. Adorned in jackrock (a device made from mining nails that can blow out the wheels of scab vehicles—a practice which the UMWA officially discourages) earrings, they faced the police, went to jail along with others, but also traveled the country and spread the word ("jawsmithing"). The Solidarity Forever Camp banner was painted on site at Camp Solidarity in a day and a half, the design utilizing a drawing of miners that Allen had done in his miner's days for The Mineworkers Journal, showing a silhouetted line of miners with their hats aglow. The slogan is sufficient and expresses perfectly the favorite union song of the 1910s-1930s, a restatement of labor's creation of all value ("Now we stand outcast and starving midst the wonder we have made") and a deeply evocative rendition of the an-injury-to-one-is-an-injury-to-all Wobbly spirit. Allen remained in Virginia to paint walls and even a barn roof on behalf of the strikers.

 

Alewitz returned in the fall with a caravan of artists and unionists from the New Jersey Industrial Union Council. Traveling fourteen hours through a bitter winter storm and a highway strewn with disabled vehicles, they staggered into the camp to deliver toys to the strikers' children. The miners had built a large drawing table for the artists to work, where they quickly and spontaneously designed and painted a banner commemorating the event. The camp was still a place to meet with strikers and fellow visitors, to share their experiences about labor solidarity and about the role of art and the artist. 

 

In the end, the Pittston UMW, joined by the 47,000 miners from elsewhere, who traveled to the site to show solidarity, and the thousands of other supporters outlasted the company. By spring, the strike was settled, with benefits that continued into negotiations with Pittston Coal thereafter. It had been a memorable moment for labor artwork as well, in some ways the most memorable since the 1940s when mainstream giants like Ben Shahn still painted on invitation for labor solidarity. 

 

The artistic result of all this was a seven-by-one-hundred-foot historical panorama banner of UMWA struggles, mine disasters, and union victories created for the union's centenary convention celebration. The panoramic narrative begins with a "breaker boy" releasing a canary that flies over the surface of the mural to alight on the hands of miners' children marching the Pittston picket line. The mural sees the history of the UMWA not simply as a struggle for rights for its members, but as a catalyst for the construction of the CIO, thus showing a scene of sit-down strikers in Flint, Michigan.

 

The centerpiece of the work is "Mother" Mary Jones—the most famous personality of women in American labor—and inevitably, John L Lewis himself. The banner also boldly suggests, with its women workers, that solidarity has now outgrown the "manly" tradition (a verse of Solidarity Forever runs, "Union Men Be Strong") for something larger and better. Alewitz was assisted by Darlene Sanderson and numerous volunteers, with Bill Kane (president of the New Jersey IUC) personally painting the red tie on the visage of John L. 

 

The imagery sparked some discussion. Young staffers and rank-and-file members of the UMWA objected to the inclusion of a scene of the union's international officers being arrested at a Pittston demonstration. Alewitz, who rarely uses living people in his murals, defended his decision. Union officers were, for once, doing the right thing by leading the union to victory—at a time when most labor officials were complicit in concessionary contracts. Throughout the strike, UMWA officers like Cecil Roberts supported the mobilization of the ranks, and through their militant (often anti-racist) speeches helped forge a movement with the confidence to take and occupy a key mine.

 

The banner was only shown for a single day in a poorly lit room at the miners' convention in Miami, then promptly buried in the UMW basement. Once the creative impulses generated by the mobilizations at Pittston ebbed, the commemorative mural was set aside. With the ranks back at work, DC staffers turned to other things... 






Tuesday, June 7, 2011

CWAC! CWAC!


CULTURAL WORKERS & ARTISTS CAUCUS (CWAC) 
of the Labor Party



LABOR PARTY FOUNDING CONVENTION/  June 6-9, 1996
Over 1400 labor representatives met in Cleveland, Ohio in the most recent attempt to establish a voice for working people. Ultimately unable to survive as an ongoing organization, the Labor Party, and its predecessor Labor Party Advocates, made a significant contribution to popularizing the idea of independent political action.
One of the most exciting components of the new Labor Party was the Cultural Workers and Artists Caucus (CWAC). This is the original appeal and a report on CWAC that gives a flavor for its activities.
(CWAC logo design by Gary Huck/ Banner by Mike Alewitz)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Artist's Appeal for a Labor Party


 

Dear Sisters and Brothers,

 

A historic opportunity is opening for artists concerned with the future of art and labor.

 

On June 6-9, over a thousand working-class leaders and activists will converge on Cleveland, Ohio, for the founding convention of a labor party in the United States.  The convention is called by Labor Party Advocates (LPA.)   LPA is firmly rooted in the trade-union movement.  It has the endorsement and active support of several important international unions and numerous district, state and local labor organizations, representing hundreds of thousands of workers. 

 

Our goal is a party which will challenge the employer's two parties in the streets, in the workplace and at the ballot box.

 

The formation of a labor party would mark a watershed for the progressive forces of this country.   It would provide a vehicle to address the struggles for international solidarity, for women's rights, for the rights of oppressed peoples, immigrant workers and others marginalized or demonized by the capitalist class.

 

As artists and cultural workers, we have a special responsibility to help illuminate that future.  The formation of a labor party would provide an opportunity for the organic linking of the struggles of workers and artists in a way not seen in decades.  It would mark an impetus for lively and critical art-making.

 

We issue this appeal to all painters, writers, poets, designers, architects, musicians, sculptors, film and video makers, actors, critics...to all artists and cultural activists without exception.  Join us for a special convening of artists in Cleveland, to help shape a cultural agenda, along with the convention itself.  Perhaps we can initiate actions which will inspire new generations of artists to use their art as a weapon for the transformation of society.

 

In Solidarity,

 

Mike Alewitz, Labor Art & Mural Project; CAC, IUC,  NJ

Rudolf Baranik, Artist, NY, NY

Elise Bryant, Artistic Director, Labor Theatre Project, Ann Arbor, MI

Brett Butler, ‘Grace Under Fire,’ Studio City, CA

Noam Chomsky, MIT, Cambridge, MA

David Craven, Art History Dept, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM

Thiago DeMello, Composer, Musician, NY, NY

Dagoberto Gilb, Writer, Carpenter, El Paso, TX

J. R. Horne, Actor, President, NY AFTRA, NY, NY

Gary Huck, Cartoonist, UE; Huck-Konopacki Cartoons, Pittsburgh, PA

Tom Juravich, Labor Center, University of  MA, Amherst, MA

Charley King, Musician, AFM, CT

Mike Konopacki, Cartoonist, Huck-Konopacki Cartoons, Madison, WI

Lucy Lippard, Author and Critic, Albuquerque, NM

John McCutcheon, Musician, AFM, VA

Betsy Salkind, Nat’l Chair, AFTRA/SAGComedians Caucus, CA

Pete Seeger, Beacon, NY

May Stevens, Artist, NY, NY

Rachel Weiss, Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Ill




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -






CWAC, CWAC, CWAC...ARTISTS BUILD SUPPORT FOR LABOR PARTY

 

by Mike Alewitz

 

Spearheaded by the Cultural Workers and Artists Caucus of the Labor Party (CWAC), activists throughout the country have begun organizing to build and energize the labor party.  CWACwas formed at the founding convention of the LP in Cleveland Ohio, in response to a call issued by a broad range of artists and performers.   Over the last several months, they have begun to organize and expand.

 

Building CWAC is an important building block for our new party.  “Workers express themselves through their art and culture.  If we don’t do the same thing we are doomed to be talking to ourselves,” says Mike Alewitz.  Alewitz has just completed a speaking tour of the west coast organized by CWAC, with the support of the Ca. Nurses Association, the SF Labor Council and the Los Angeles chapter of the LP, along with numerous other individuals.  The tour went to Seattle, and Olympia Washington, Portland, Oregon, Los Angeles and San Francisco Ca.  The meetings attracted dozens of activists who set up CWACgroups all along the coast.  Discussions were lively and serious, and a number of activities are already planned.

 

“Today there is a huge layer of artists and activists, which numbers into the millions, who can be drawn around the LP by cultural events,” explains Lee Ballinger.  Ballinger is a prime initiator of CWAC, and a central organizer in the Los Angeles area.  He also is an associate editor of Rock and Rap Confidential. “Vast numbers of workers will relate to the LP not by coming to chapter meetings or forums, but by expressing the LP program, as they interpret it through their poetry and music.  We need to take the LP program and get it into the hands of as many artists as possible, including celebrity artists, to make it part of a genuine discussion going on throughout society.”  

 

“We have a multi-layered approach to the organizing effort,” adds John Connolly.  John is a working actor, a Vice-President of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA,) and a CWACleader.  “On the one hand we want to organize rank and file workers and artists into support for the Labor Party, but we also intend to build support within the entertainment unions themselves.”   This is no small task, for the entertainment industry is one of the main export industries of the US economy...a multi-billion dollar industry designed to disarm workers both abroad and at home.  


If anyone thinks that the lives of working artists has grown easier over recent years, Betsy Salkind a working stand-up comedienne and chair of the AFTRA-SAG(Screen Actors Guild) Comedians Caucus, will be quick to point out that the entertainment industry grows more mercenary every day.  She explained the problem facing comics at a Los Angeles organizing meeting.  “Not only has the club scene changed to eliminate acts they must pay for, but in some instances performers have to ‘pay to play’ in search of an elusive recognition which never materializes.  The economic conditions facing comics can destroy their lives as well as lower the quality of comedy.”

 

“The proliferation of comedy on television cable in particular has killed the club scene.  And the use of non-0union production companies has made it extremely difficult for comics to make a living, even on television.  Very few have health insurance, despite the fact that you see them on TV.”

 

 Other artists joining in the new Los Angeles group included rapper

a leader of the micro-broadcasting movement.  Rose explained how he had learned to bring his militant politics to his audience:  “When I started I used to get into these long political diatribes, where I’d go on and on for fifteen or twenty minutes.  Then I realized that people were tuned out.  I had to bring out the politics with the music, in the music, and sometimes over the music.”

 

In San Francisco two successful meetings were held back to back at the meeting of the SFLabor Council.  Included in the audience were Susan Greene and Aaron Noble, who are currently involved with a group of mural painters creating a series of labor murals.  


Another muralist, and award-winning scenic painter, in attendance was Irish activist Edain O’Donnell who pointed out, “There are plenty of workers who have no illusions in the elections...we can make a difference in exposing what the bosses want to happen during the elections and throughout the rest of the year.”

 

“The CWACcan be a poll of attraction for a lot of artists who want to do progressive work,” points out Lincoln Cushing.  “Many of the progressive artists groups around the country have collapsed over the last several years.  The LP will provide a real link to the working class...one that will be here for a long time.” Lincoln is a leader of the Inkworks printing collective, and a graphic artist from Berkeley, who attended the San Francisco meeting with Doug Minkler, a well-know poster artist.

 

 



 


 

 

 

RESOLUTION ON CULTURAL WORK

 

Adopted unanimously by the Cultural Workers & Artists Caucus (CWAC) of the Labor Party, May 31, 1996

 

1. From the Paterson silk-strike pageant to the P-9 mural, labor history is filled with examples of art and culture inspiring and energizing working people's movements.  Cultural and spiritual needs play important roles in the struggle for economic justice. A labor party will only succeed in stirring people's hopes and imaginations if it embraces and promotes the arts.

 

2. The labor movement has traditionally embraced artists of many kinds.  From its inception, the labor party will recognize, support and welcome artists of the greatest possible ethnic, cultural and stylistic diversity. 

 

3.  The labor party will champion the cause of artists by working for comprehensive arts funding, for arts education in schools and workplaces, and for making culture accessible to working people throughout the country.

 

4.  Many in government and business fear and distrust art, and have attempted to divide artists and intellectuals from the labor movement. We, on the other hand, appreciate all inquiry, research, experimentation and imagination. The labor party will have no interest in dictating artistic styles or subject matter, or in any way interfering with artists' aspirations. The search for truth, and the attempt to awaken public imagination, can only strengthen the working class.  

 

5.  The labor party will oppose censorship in all its forms, including censorship of new technologies like the Internet. We reject attempts at censorship whether they arise from government halls, corporate boardrooms, or within the labor movement itself. If we are to win artists to our cause, we must stand--absolutely and without faltering--for total artistic and intellectual freedom. 

 

6. As we approach the 21st century, the struggle for working people's rights must take on a more international quality. As a way to develop more unity--and to share ideas and visions--across national boundaries, the labor party will strongly support international artistic and cultural exchanges.

 

7. Artists are workers. We support the efforts of artists to organize into unions, to earn decent wages and to fight for safer working conditions. We call for public arts funding to provide jobs for artists and to make culture more publically accessible. We encourage labor unions and all other progressive organizations to respect artists' endeavors, both intellectually and financially.

 

8. The labor party will encourage musicians, painters, poets, actors, filmmakers and all other artists to participate in strikes and organizing campaigns of working people. Interested artists will be invited to help build the labor party, to play a role in shaping its direction, and to participate in its decision-making processes.

 

9. The labor party will include art and culture in its campaigns at national and local levels.

 

10. As an initial organizing effort, we will establish a national network of artists interested in helping to build the labor party. We will attempt to organize meetings to promote and to shape these efforts in major cities throughout the country, as well as in other areas where interest develops.  We are particularly interested in involving young workers, artists and activists in these meetings.

 

11.  We recommend that the labor party establish a department of cultural affairs to develop policies and implement this resolution.

 

12. This resolution should be viewed as a draft to initiate further discussion, which must eventually include as many interested artists and workers as possible.




Thursday, May 26, 2011

VOTE NO




LAWYERS & PORK CHOPPERS/ Mural Detail - An Injury to One is an Injury to All
by Mike Alewitz




VOTE NO

(The following talk was given by Mike Alewitz, CCSUProfs4Progress, at the Stand Up, Fight Back:A Socialist Action Forum on the National Assault against Workers and Public Services, May 26, 2011, Hartford. Other panelists included writer Jonathan Pelto and Colin Donnaruma of Save Our SUNY)



 

Over the past two months, union officials representing government employees and the Democratic Party of Connecticut have given us a remarkable display of solidarity.  Unfortunately, it has been a close-knit unity directed against state workers.


An absolute blanket of secrecy was imposed around negotiations for state demands for $1.6 billion in concessions from union workers. Not one local union officer, representative of a labor council, international rep or other union official has spoken out against a massive, malicious media campaign directed against state workers.


While the poor of the state have been told that pampered union workers would be responsible for cutting of social services, while we were portrayed as overpaid freeloaders – union officials remained mute.


During this whole time, you could not even find out the names of the bargaining agents that were supposedly representing us.



Sugar-Coated Poison


Last Tuesday, and again yesterday, I attended a large meeting of college professors anxious to hear a report on concessions demanded by Governor Dannel Malloy. We were not shown the actual agreement–only a summary that is clearly a spin operation to sugarcoat the theft of billions of dollars from the pockets of state workers.


According to State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (SEBAC), it’s great news – No layoffs! No furlough days!


That’s true enough – but here is what the agreement does:


    • Eliminates at least 1000 jobs through attrition.  That will impact on socially useful programs that serve working people, as well as require speed-up of already overburdened employees.

    • Billions of dollars will be lost in wages - transferred to corporate executives and bankers that populate this, one of the richest states in the country, through tax breaks. The students of our state will be indebted to those same bankers for the rest of their lives, paying off school loans from low-wage jobs
 
    • It calls for labor-management committees that are designed to create speed up conditions in the workplace.

    • Includes long-term givebacks for 20 years, even though the whole point of opening concessions was supposedly to solve a temporary budget problem.

    • Ensures that work will continue to be outsourced to sweatshop companies both in this country and overseas–whether it be information management or grounds keeping.
 
    • Means that tuition will go up, classes will get larger and programs will get cut.
 
    • Will allow for continuing erosion of tenure, shared governance and academic freedom.
 
    • Will inevitably weaken affirmative action, women’s and civil rights.
 
    • Advances the corporatization and privatization of public education.


Along with the theft of our wages and income through loss of pension and retirement benefits, the SEBAC-Malloy cabal has engineered a remarkable giveaway to health insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Employees will be mandated to have such procedures as colonoscopies under penalty of noncompliance.  This is no joke. You will be charged $1200 a year, if you opt out of a plan whereby insurance bureaucrats and management can enforce such procedures.


Billions of dollars are being stolen from our wages. Despite this fact, professors left the room in a relatively buoyant mood. It could’ve been worse! Why, since we had furlough days this year, and there won’t be any furlough days next year, it’s practically like getting a raise!


We have been fed this kind of anti-worker poison for so long, that we have been programmed to accept cuts that affect others, as long as givebacks don’t hurt ourselves.  Dump it on the new hires.  Dump it on the next generation of teachers. Dump it on the future retirees. Dump it on the students. Dump it on the community.


How did this come to be? How is it, that professors can stand before students every day to speak and teach the greatest of human aspirations, and then descend to being bought off so cheaply? Think about your teachers and your professors. Are these people selfish? No – and they are no different from other workers in manufacturing or the crafts - we are all responding to the same pressures.


Why isn’t there a fight back? We have seen the mobilizations in Wisconsin - why not here in Connecticut? Why has there not been a generalized uprising against these assaults on state workers and public education?


To understand this, we have to step back and look at the framework and history of working-class politics in the United States.



Roots of the Crisis


The US came out of World War II as the preeminent world power by being able to maneuver Europe, Japan and the Soviet Union into mutual destruction. Then, as now, war aims of the United States had nothing to do with democracy, human rights or anti-fascism – it was a cynical policy based on what would advance American corporate interests.   

                                                                                                                                                  

In order to get millions of people to slaughter each other on the field of battle, you have to promise them things–a higher standard of living, political freedom, an end to discrimination, etc. When the war was over, working-class and anti-colonial struggles engulfed the world. The late 1940s, growing class-consciousness in the United States led to massive strike waves involving millions of workers.


At the same time, the labor officialdom made a deal with the devil - the social pact that came out of the war. In return for increased paychecks and benefits for its members, union officials agreed to align themselves with US foreign policy and to not question the right of the capitalist to rule. In return for labor peace, the members of unions could look forward to a rising standard of living that did not exist for working people anywhere else in the world.


From 1945 to 1975 workers wages rose an average of 250%. In return for being well-behaved Americans, workers could have a one-income household, own a house and an automobile and have access to both healthcare and education for their children.


Throughout the last half of the century, as workers prospered, unions became more bureaucratized and conservative. Radicals were driven out of the leadership of the labor movement. A privileged bureaucracy with bloated salaries arose – top union bureaucrats literally became millionaires. The traditions of labor militancy that gave rise to modern industrial unions were forgotten.


But the United States began to lose its standing in the world. Japan and Germany built more modern and efficient production on the rubble of their bombed cities, initiating another cycle of inter-capitalist rivalry. The prosperity of the 50s and the 60s began to ebb, as the US faced greater international competition. With the realignment of the world’s economy, manufacturing dramatically declined in the United States. The great industrial giants of coal, steel, rubber, auto and shipbuilding virtually disappeared. Huge industrial unions, like the United Mine Workers and the Steelworkers became ghosts of their former selves.



Public Sector Workers


Not all sections of the labor movement were in decline. Although the manufacturing base declined, new sections of the labor movement emerged and began to grow. During the 1970s, militant struggles erupted that led to the widespread organization of government workers and educators. Many of the leaders and ranks of this new movement had been influenced by the anti-Vietnam war, civil rights and women’s movements.


Militant struggles led to an increase in the standard of living in this part of the working class–even as real wages began to decline for manufacturing workers. This was particularly exemplified by the situation of teachers. Up until the expansion of the American Federation of teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), teachers were considered to be “professionals” with few rights and little financial reward. But newly organized teachers fought for, and won, better contracts.


College professors were much slower to appreciate the fact that they are workers–and their confusion about this remains a central political problem to this day. Without significant resistance, the employers have been able to seriously erode the working conditions of professors. Tenure is rapidly disappearing and the vaunted career as an academic, with time for travel and research, has been replaced by contingent labor.


Much of the work performed on university campuses is now outsourced. This rationalization of educational labor has been propelled forward by the changing needs of American capital. The growth of community colleges and four-year public universities followed the expansion of modernized industry during the prosperous post WWII years - but the needs of capitalism have changed. What we see today is a generalized dismantling and dumbing-down of public higher education.



Its the Democrats


In return for higher wages, unions gave up their traditional goal of building a labor party, in favor of support to the Democrats. This mistaken policy has been an abysmal failure, year after year. And yet, yesterday I sat in a meeting and was informed by an AAUP/SEBAC official that we should accept their concession contracts now, so that we can be sure to elect labor-friendly Democrats that will turn things around in the next general election. This, despite the fact that Malloy and the Democrats are leading the assault on state workers – the very politicians labor supported in the last elections!


Union officials like to characterize the assault on labor as Republican, or right-wing. But the truth is that it is a bipartisan effort being led by the Obama White House. Democratic governors are leading the attacks on state workers in Massachusetts, Oregon, California, New York, Illinois, Washington, Hawaii, Minnesota, Maryland and New Hampshire, here in CT and other states.


What Malloy is doing in the state of Connecticut is no different than what happened under the Republican governor of Wisconsin. The only difference is that Malloy is more effective, because he has corralled labor officials into his support.


Malloy referred to the tentative agreement as: 

"historic because of the way we achieved it - we respected the collective bargaining process and we respected each other, negotiating in good faith, without fireworks and without anger."


The Democratic governor of Washington stated similarly: 

"I did it by going to the table, respecting their collective bargaining rights and we got the job done."


The Democratic governor of Oregon is demanding 20 to 25 percent pay cut for state workers: 

"But those concessions will be made across a bargaining table through our collective bargaining process and with mutual respect."


When MA House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to strip public employees of most of their rights to bargain over health care Robert Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO stated:


"It's pretty stunning. These are the same Democrats that all these labor unions elected. The same Democrats who we contributed to in their campaigns. The same Democrats who tell us over and over again that they're with us, that they believe in collective bargaining, that they believe in unions. . . . “


Not so surprising to us socialists, Bob! What the Democrats are doing in Massachusetts is no different than what Scott Walker is doing in Wisconsin.  


Malloy and Scott Walker and Barak Obama – all the Democratic and Republican politicians from Dennis Kucinich to Michelle Bachman - serve the same masters.


The fight against massive cuts in wages and benefits cannot be separated from the attack on legal collective bargaining. Actually, concessionary bargaining is even more destructive than anti-labor laws passed in Wisconsin. Some of the greatest periods of union activity took place when the laws were least favorable to workers. What really matters is the class-consciousness and combativeness of workers. Despite the passing of anti-labor laws, workers in Wisconsin are stronger today than they were a year ago, because they are no longer under the illusion that they have friends in government.  


On the other hand, the deal in CT has completely disoriented, demoralized and weakened workers.


Why do the union officials keep us bound to these creeps? To understand why labor officials refuse to act independently of the Democratic Party, you have to understand their social base. These are not workers - they are professional “leaders.” Bureaucrats.


In 2008, nearly 10,000 union officials or staff in the US brought home salaries greater than $100,000, consuming over $1 billion of their member’s money. They compose a massive, conservative layer of functionaries attempting to preserve the peace.


They identify with the employers and their two parties.  So in the fall, union officials will come to us once again, telling us to vote for Malloy and Obama, because they are the lesser of two evils. Once again, they will try to convince us to await the second coming of Christ - hoping to be swept up in the rapture.



Vote No!


So what should we do?  If you are a state worker – VOTE NO!


There is nothing unprincipled about voting to accept concessions, if you feel that you have waged a struggle and achieved the best that is possible. But there has been no struggle here. There has not been a single demonstration by state workers or their supporters. This is just a deal cooked up by a bunch of bureaucrats and state officials.


In fact, it can barely be considered collective bargaining–there has been no input from the actual members. On that basis alone, it would be a step forward for state workers to reject this kind of secret, anti-democratic deal.


In the longer run, there is no shortcut to building a class struggle left wing in the labor movement. This is what groups like CCSU Profs4Progress represent–the idea of building international solidarity, political independence and labor militancy.


CT is awash in wealth - stolen and kept hostage by the super-rich. But working people are aware of this.  Eventually, the contradiction what is possible vs. what exists will draw us to write new chapters of class struggle.  We will get to that point by fighting concessions and organizing international solidarity.



Labor Solidarity Has No Borders


That leads me to the second most important thing we can do - fight against the war.  Ending the US wars and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and the Israeli occupation of Palestine, is the central issue that faces every single working person in the world.


The importance of the anti-war movement does not just lie in ending the enormous human and material waste. In opposing the wars, we can overcome the central ideological chains that bind us –the idea that we are

Americans, and not workers.


The American Empire is dying. One look at the current clown car of Republican candidates reveals a ruling class with no future and no vision. Both parties exhibit the lowest level of bourgeois politics – appealing to the most backward of ideas of racism and sexism.


The ruling class has only one agenda - to take more. More from your paycheck, more from your retirement, more from your healthcare. There is no limit to their gluttony–and it is the greed itself that drives them. The creation of every new political, economic or ecological disaster is just another opportunity for profit.


Most of us recognize the arrogance and Imperial policies of the United States government. The US has the mightiest military machine that the world has ever known. But equally important as the weapons of destruction that are directed against colonial peoples fighting for their liberation, are those aimed at the working people of this country.


That is an ideological weapon – a straitjacket that we are put into from the time we stick our head out of the womb (or out of the window of the vehicle you arrived in) and you are told that you are special because you are an American. 


From that moment on all of the pressure of society is applied to convince you that you are special, you are unique, you are superior, you have a destiny that is ordained by God, and that whatever differences you have ultimately are transcended by the fact that you are an American.


This idea that you are an American and not a worker is the most critical ideological weapon that the ruling class possesses. As long as workers are held in the straitjacket of Americanism, we will continue to be weak.  The instant we become class-conscious, anything becomes possible – including taking power out of the hands of these lunatics.


When we sit in our little meetings and forums, that may seem a long way off. But history does not unfold simply as long fluid curves–but has great leaps, often coming when least expected.


The heroic act of a Tunisian street peddler sparked a revolutionary struggle in that country that led to an even deeper social transformation in Egypt. That inspired the amazing events in Wisconsin. Yesterday it was students in Arizona – today mass mobilizations are sweeping Spain.


There will be generalized fight back in the US against these assaults–not because workers want to, but because they have to. People are being driven desperately, day-by-day, inch-by-inch, to the point where they have to respond.  We are living in a pressure cooker. The explosion is coming.



NO CUTS! NO LAYOFFS! NO CONCESSIONS!





Saturday, May 21, 2011

CONCESSIONS & COLONOSCOPIES





CONCESSIONS & COLONOSCOPIES


BY MIKE ALEWITZ

Over the past two months, union officials representing government employees and the Democratic Party of Connecticut have given us a remarkable display of solidarity. Unfortunately, it has been a close-knit solidarity directed against state workers. 

An absolute blanket of secrecy was imposed over negotiations of state demands for $1.6 billion in concessions from union workers. Not one local union officer, representative of a labor council, international rep or other union official has spoken out against a massive, malicious media campaign directed against state workers. 

In fact, you could not even find out the names of the bargaining representatives that were supposedly representing us. 

While the poor of the state have been told that pampered union workers would be responsible for cutting of social services, while the super wealthy have been given a free ride, while corporations continue to pay no taxes – union officials have remained silent. We don’t want to negotiate in the press, they said. Why not? Because workers would have a chance to express themselves?

Tuesday, I attended a large meeting of college professors anxious to hear a report on concessions demanded by the Democratic administration of Connecticut. We were not shown the actual agreement–only a summary that is clearly a spin operation to sugarcoat the theft of billions of dollars from the pockets of state workers.

Great news everybody – no layoffs!  They’re just going to eliminate thousands of jobs through attrition.

Never mind the effect this has on important state programs or the fact that it will require speed-up of already overburdened workers.

Never mind the fact that the deal includes long-term givebacks for 20 years, even though the whole point of opening concessions was supposedly to solve a temporary budget problem.

Never mind that the state unions backed Malloy and the other Democratic politicians that are now stabbing us in the back. 

Never mind that the corporate executives and bankers that populate this, one of the richest states in the country, are essentially the recipients of these billions of dollars through tax breaks.

Never mind that the students of our state will be indebted to those bankers for the rest of their lives, paying off loans from low-wage jobs.

Never mind that work will continue to be outsourced to sweatshop companies both in this country and overseas–whether it be information management or grounds keeping.

Never mind that tuition will go up, classes will get larger and programs will get cut.

Never mind that tenure is being eliminated.

Never mind that public education is being gutted

Along with the theft of our wages and income through loss of pension and retirement benefits, the union-management cabal has engineered a remarkable giveaway to health insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Employees will be mandated to have such procedures as colonoscopies under penalty of noncompliance. This is no joke. You will be charged $1200 a year, if you opt out of a plan whereby insurance bureaucrats and management can enforce such procedures.

Billions of dollars are being stolen from our wages. Despite this fact, professors left the room in a buoyant mood. It could’ve been worse! Why, since we had furlough days this year, and there won’t be any furlough days next year, it’s practically like getting a raise!

We have been fed this poison for so long. We have been programmed to accept cuts that affect others, as long as givebacks don’t hurt me. Dump it on the new hires. Dump it on the next generation of teachers. Dump it on the future retirees. Dump it on the students. Dump it on the community.

In the fall, professors will return to the classrooms. We will work even harder than we already do. We will try to work around every rotten thing that is done to us by state officials and visionless University educrats. We will go the extra mile for the students because we take enormous pride in our work and we believe in public education.

In the fall, union officials will come to us once again, telling us to vote for Malloy and Obama, because they are the lesser of two evils. Even as the Democratic governors of Massachusetts, California, New York, Illinois, Washington and many other states lead the assault on workers rights, we will once again be told that they are the friends of labor. Once again, they will try to convince us to await the second coming of Christ - hoping to be swept up in the rapture.

At the union meeting, they served coconut-crusted shrimp for refreshments. I’ve observed a relationship between the quality of refreshments provided at a union meeting, to the amount of crap they are trying to sell to the members. Nothing like those tasty shrimps and a glass of wine to put you in the mood for giving up a few billion dollars in concessions.

So enjoy your summer adventures. Have a great trip. Get that book done. Be glad you have a job. Things will get better. In the meantime, have another shrimp. Drink another glass of wine. Now, bend over – you’re not going to feel a thing...


* * * * *

Addendum:

It has now been some days since the summary agreement was released, and there is still not a peep of opposition from our so-called leaders. 

If we have learned anything from the events of the past year I hope it is from the example of the workers in Tunisia, Egypt and Wisconsin that have made it clear we cannot rely on Democratic Party officials or union bureaucrats to wage our fights–we must fight for ourselves, our students and our community.

I intend to vote no to this contract and I urge you to do the same.

If you believe in the right to collective bargaining, and that contracts should be honored, then vote no.

If you believe that state workers should be treated with dignity, then vote no.

If you believe that we should have a right to a decent wages and working conditions, then vote no.

If you are tired of seeing the wealth of working people go into the pockets of the superrich, then vote no.

If you are tired of paying taxes that go for war and prisons, instead of education, while the wealthy pay no taxes, then vote no.

If you are tired of being the host for a parasitic healthcare and pharmaceutical industry, then vote no.

If you are tired of secret deals between union bureaucrats and management, then vote no.

If you are tired of seeing your students robbed of their future, then vote no.

If you are tired of being told you have to accept crumbs, and that we cannot aspire to a better world, then vote no.


NO CUTS! NO LAYOFFS! NO CONCESSIONS!





Monday, May 2, 2011

CELEBRATING DEATH


CELEBRATING DEATH




COMPETITION
by Mike Alewitz
7' x 10'/ 1995
from The Worker in the New World Order



 

ARTISTS AFTER 9/11


Amidst the cries for blood we must raise a voice of peace and justice.

 


The following article appeared in the March 2002 issue of 'Mass Dissent,' the
newsletter of the Massachusetts chapter of the National Lawyers Guild.


_______________________________


If we were to write the truth about recent U. S. history, it might read something
like this:

The spoiled son of the former head of the secret police, having failed at
everything else in life, runs for U. S. President.  Since it appears he might not
win, his brother, the governor of a large state, throws a bunch of votes his way
by disenfranchising thousands of African- American voters.  The Supreme Court,
pals of his dad, put their stamp of approval on the process.  The politicians of
both political parties agree that we must put this all behind us for the good of
the country.

The President assembles a cabinet that includes a general who got his start by
covering up the Mai Lai Massacre in Vietnam.  His Attorney General is so hated in
his old Senatorial district that he actually lost his last election to a corpse.  (He
is now engaged in a campaign to drape the breasts on statuary in Government
buildings.)  

When the new gang gets to Washington, they immediately reward themselves and
their rich pals with a trillion dollars in stolen tax money.  They then set about the
task of the serious long-term plunder of the country.  

They were all having a swell time when two jet airliners slam into the symbol of
US financial power - World Trade Center - and the symbol of military power, the
Pentagon.  Fearing attack, the President immediately took off for parts unknown
- a reprisal of his role during the Vietnam War  (which would have been fine - if
done out of principal instead of cowardice.)

The Mayor of New York actually stayed in town and showed up at the site of the
disaster, therefore he was immediately proclaimed a hero.  Prior to this he was
mostly known for supporting police violence, harassing the poor and homeless
and chasing artists off the steps of the Metropolitan Museum. He proceeded to
see if he could have himself declared mayor again.

The hijackers were apparently Arab. Though there was no declaration, war was
immediately declared on Afghanistan - although none of the hijackers were
Afghani.  Evil was denounced.  Howdy Doody strode the fields of Crawford, Texas
threatening to git the varmints.  AFL-CIO officials promptly stepped forward to
pledge allegiance in the employer's mission for mutual slaughter of the working
class. The most advanced military machine in the world then proceeded to bomb
the most backward - spending billions of dollars to turn rubble into finer rubble.  
Heroes again.

The purpose of this was to kill a terrorist originally promoted by the U.S.  But,
after a few weeks that was all forgotten.  Like the anthrax scare.  Like the
pipeline that the oil companies wanted to build across Afghanistan if they could
only get a stable government in place.

Having proven their prowess on the field of battle, the politicians are now
bickering over what country should be the next target.  Here at home they are
celebrating this new victory for freedom with the establishment of military
tribunals and a discussion of the benefits of torture. . .

You get the idea.  I'm only scratching the surface here.  I could go on.  

*   *   *

What has all this got to do with art and artists? Everything. We package and sell
the lies.  When they drag out the talking heads to convince you to support US
war aims, we operate the cameras, create the graphics, design the lighting,
handle the sound, write and play the background music, pull out the safari jacket,
put on the make-up and otherwise make them appear sincere.

When you see the same twenty Palestinians purportedly dancing in celebration of
the NY disaster, it was edited and put together by video artists all trained in our
art schools.  We create the billboards and posters, the snappy army ads and the
tearful ground zero photographs.

When the patriotic extravaganzas are performed, we are the choreographers,
dancers, prop and costume makers that appeal so effectively to your emotions.

The entertainment industry is the second largest export industry of the US.  The
first is war materials.  In a sense, they both do the same thing.  We make the
world safe for Enron.

*   *   *


Art is a magical process - and you don't see it illustrated any more effectively
than when US artists transform war into play. We make the real become unreal,
and the unreal become real.  We can transform the horror of war into a video
game.  If you're good at it they will pay you millions of dollars - sometimes
hundreds of millions.

Of course most artists don't make much money at all.  We are cultural workers
struggling to survive.  Like workers in the armaments or chemical or nuclear
industries, you block out the ultimate consequences of your labor in order to
survive.

But while artists are forced to do the employers bidding during the eight or ten
or twelve hours, the rest of the time is ours.  We can choose to use our skills to
fight for peace and justice - to reach across borders or rip the veil off the
American system of racist injustice.  

*    *     *

A living art challenges it's audience to look at the world in new ways: to be
critical; to look at things from all points of view.  It is an active process between
the viewer and the author. Revolutionary politics requires the same.  That is one
of the reasons there has been a historical alliance of artists with the labor
movement.

Over the past fifteen years the Labor Art & Mural Project (LaMP) has traveled
throughout the US and the world to support working-class struggles for social
and economic justice.  We have created murals that are projects not of
governments but from workers to workers.  Wherever we have gone we have
been welcomed warmly by those who understand that there is a difference
between the American people and the US government.  Other groups have
created puppets for demonstrations, held hip-hop concerts for global justice,
conducted poetry readings and used their art in a myriad of ways.  It's all part of
an organic process of building international solidarity.

In recent years the American labor movement has begun to recognize and reach
out to immigrant workers.  We have also made strides in building unity with our
fellow workers in Mexico, Central and South America.  The tragic events of
September 11 provide an opportunity to extend similar solidarity to the workers
of the Middle-East.  Whenever given the opportunity, these workers have jumped
at the chance to fight for their unions and extend the struggle for democratic
rights.  We can and must work together in solidarity.

As the politicians rush to create a permanent war, we artists have a special
responsibility. Never has there been such an overwhelming deluge of lies.  Those
who wish to continue the bloodbath are a small minority.  The great majority of
the earth's working people have demonstrated that they favor peace and
solidarity.  We can use our art to give expression to that vision.  We can be a
voice for those who are voiceless. We can use our songs, poems, theater and
paint to illuminate a future where human needs come before profits. Amidst the
cries for blood we must raise a voice of peace and justice.


______________________________

Mike Alewitz is a mural painter working in the US and internationally.  He is the
Artistic Director of the Labor Art & Mural Project.  He teaches mural painting at
Central CT State University.


_______________________________